US Supreme Court rules on ‘violent game’ case

As expected, the US Supreme Court has now issued its verdict in the Brown vs EMA case that would have restricted the sale of ‘violent’ videogames to anyone under 18 and would require such games to adopt a special label.
The case is a victory for the EMA with Justice Scalia ruling that “the act forbidding sale or rental of violent games to minors does not comport with the 1st Amendment.” The Ninth Circuit Court has now ruled in favor of the EMA (by a vote of 7-2), saying that the law violated the First Amendment.
This on-going case can now be put to rest and it loooks like video games will now receive First Amendment protection rights.
The full decision can be read here in pdf form (and it’s worth it for some surprisingly funny lines).
Source: Game Politics

Recommended Videos

 


PC Invasion is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more
related content
Read Article PSA: Cows produce different foods in LEGO Fortnite depending on what they eat
Psa Cows Can Produce Different Foods In Lego Fortnite
Read Article Metaphor: ReFantazio places big twists on social links and romance
Metaphor Refantazio Romance Party
Read Article Moon Studios plans to add a farming update to No Rest for the Wicked
Moon Studios Plans To Add A Farming Update To No Rest For The Wicked
Related Content
Read Article PSA: Cows produce different foods in LEGO Fortnite depending on what they eat
Psa Cows Can Produce Different Foods In Lego Fortnite
Read Article Metaphor: ReFantazio places big twists on social links and romance
Metaphor Refantazio Romance Party
Read Article Moon Studios plans to add a farming update to No Rest for the Wicked
Moon Studios Plans To Add A Farming Update To No Rest For The Wicked
Author
Paul Younger
Founder and Editor of PC Invasion. Founder of the world's first gaming cafe and Veteran PC gamer of over 22 years.