IncGamers Network
|
Interview

Vanilla World of Warcraft update interview with Mark Kern

world of warcraft

It’s been a quiet few weeks since Blizzard agreed to set up a meeting with Mark Kern and the Nostalrius team to discuss the prospect of vanilla World of Warcraft servers. We wanted to find out what’s been happening since the petition reached its goal and what lies ahead based on the all the feedback that’s been gathered from the WoW community.

PC Invasion: It was great to see the petition reach its goal. Were you surprised at Blizzard’s response prior to your video going live?

Mark Kern: I was surprised. The video release date had been announced, and Blizzard’s statement was released in the early AM hours when people were asleep. Definitely caught me by surprise. We accelerated our video release schedule to meet the new statement on equal footing.

PCI: You were not convinced completely by Blizzard’s response, especially when they mentioned licensing. Can you expand on that?

Mark Kern: Well, it’s just that we have numerous examples of server licensing working for older versions of games. Everquest was licensed and Ultima Online was licensed. Having worked directly on WoW licensing in the past, I was surprised to hear J.Allen Brack’s statement that it was near impossible. In my mind and experience, it’s not only possible, it’s been done before.

PCI: Blizzard has proposed a “pristine server” but that doesn’t go far enough for the vanilla fans. Do you think they will listen and go full vanilla?

Mark Kern: I don’t play current WoW, so I have to rely on the feedback from players about the idea of “pristine servers.” While many have said its a good step forward, just as many have said that without the original content and gameplay, its not what they want. I don’t know if Blizzard will do vanilla or not, but I think they would be leaving a lot of money and gamer goodwill out in the cold if they didn’t do vanilla. 256,000 fans and packed private servers running vanilla emulators shows the demand isn’t just there, its huge.

PCI: For the past couple of weeks you’ve been posting out questions to the community via Twitter asking them what they would like to see from a vanilla service. How has this helped you understand the mindset of the vanilla players?

Mark Kern:  A lot. People are clearly in two camps. Many want to play the game as it was, as a sort of historical monument to relive old content and to enjoy once again what thrilled them the first time they played. Others seem to want WoW to improve along its original design philosophies. These people believe Blizzard changed their design approach around Wrath and definitely by Cataclysm. It seems like they wish legacy WoW would continue to grow in the original way it was intended. Its been fascinating to see the different opinions, feedback and comments. I think there is a lot of clear disappointment with the way current WoW is structured and the survey reflects that.

Warcraft

Behold! Mark Kern with a mighty stack of petition papers.

PCI: Details such as not using the new character models have received a strong “no” response. Are you surprised that even a feature like this is not wanted?

Mark Kern: No, it makes sense. People want historical vanilla WoW, and even those who want improvements are hesitant to ask for any changes that would raise the cost or difficulty of making legacy servers a reality. Also, I was reminded of when Everquest changed their player models and how many preferred the older EQ models, so its something I’ve seen before.

PCI: How much of World of Warcraft do you think should be ported over to vanilla? Up to TBC seems to be the stopping point for a lot of players and do you think Blizzard would be willing to even go that far or beyond to WoTLK?

Mark Kern: We should simply start at the beginning with vanilla. Launching anything else would logically be based on how well the vanilla version went and if the demand is sustainable. I have a hunch it might be very sustainable and open up a new line of products for Blizzard.

PCI: What do you think would be the best way to handle this expansion progression?

Mark Kern: I’m a fan of a manual opt-in process. If we just patch vanilla servers up to TBC and Wrath and beyond, we’ll end up right where we started…asking for vanilla servers again. A manual process is where the vanilla server would not be upgraded at all, but stand as a historical server on its own so people can always go back to it. Meanwhile, characters could be copied to expansions as they are ported and released, giving players the best of all worlds.

PCI: The majority want as little as possible changed. Do you think that could turn Blizzard off the idea of pursuing this?

Mark Kern:  No I think it would make it easier for Blizzard to say yes. Modifying a game is always more time and money. That said, if the relaunch is a success, I’m sure there will be improvements. But I think these should be done very minimally to avoid a slippery slope of changes that dilute the core of vanilla servers.

PCI: Nostalrius decided not to release the source code once the meeting had been confirmed which caused a mixed reaction in the vanilla community. Why do you think this was an important decision?

Mark Kern: Yes. While the source code is open source in part and engineered by the Nostalrius team in others, it’s still not legal to host a private server due to IP restrictions and lack of official licensing. Releasing the code would have only undermined the legitimacy of Nostalrius claim and clearly upset Blizzard.

PCI: Things move slowly in the world of Blizzard. Have you received a message from Mike and the Blizzard team?

Mark Kern: Yes, in fact I just did. Date will be posted on my twitter feed @grummz and on my blog crixa.io very, very soon.

Update 16 May: A date for the meeting has now been set.

Directly related to this story

DIRECTLY SUPPORT US

Become a PC Invasion Supporter

Support PC Invasion by becoming a supporter. Ad free, actively shape the site content, and gain priority access to contests and giveaways.



Related to this article

Comments

  • As someone who didnt have a computer and now is in love with Blizzard games, I would love the idea of getting the chance to experience WoW as everyone else did years ago. I love the idea of a vanilla server then allowing characters to transfer out of the Vanilla server into a BC server update and so forth, this way someone can experience WoW as it was because if I start now, Deathwing already had his rampage and you dont get to see everything slowly progress, you just see the end result and it feels empty

  • Jürgen Jockel

    I dont really know what the problem is content-wise.
    Make 3 servers.
    One will always be Vanilla, one will be Vanilla and in 2 years turn to TBC and stay there and the third one will be Vanilla, in 2 years TBC and in another 2 years WotLK and then stay there.
    Make it possible for people on TBC or Vanilla servers to transfer to the server with the next expansion.
    Thats everything people want.
    Then, if they are successful, you can maybe think about getting bugs or balancing issues fixed that were only fixed in later versions.

    • shhfiftyfive

      not many people would appreciate dividing the legacy community into 3 groups from the very start. the first group is all you need. the copy character is all you need. tbc and wotlk fans can wait. also, you do not want to have blizzard splitting its attention between 3 legacy products at this time.

      many tbc fans or wotlk fans are not going to be fans of playing vanilla for 2 years, etc. for them, blizzard may need to add the option for ONE free boost when those servers release, like they have available in retail.

      if they want more than one character boosted well, too bad, they can go level in vanilla and park it til the xpac server releases and copy it over. or wait til the new xpac comes and start leveling, with new racials/races like everyone else. or pay for the race change (which is going to be a big money maker for blizzard)

      • Kaynin

        He’s not suggesting all 3 open at the same time.

        OP is saying make a time locked event that will eventually open new servers up to Wrath where a person can keep their lvl 60 vanilla on vanilla AND have their 60 copy to CB in which they can go to max & then once again in Wrath.

        This would make a single account have 3 of the same chars in 3 diff timelines which means if someone felt like going back and raiding MC on Monday then raiding Tempest on Tuesday or even Ice crown they can.

        It would ONLY divide the community for people who ONLY want to play Vanilla or BC because that’s their Jown.

        • shhfiftyfive

          nope. your comprehension is bad.

          • George Macpherson

            mark replied saying they would just start with vanilla and see how it would go then work from there lol